Notable Genre Anniversaries in 2022, Part 4 of 4

“When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” — Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes

I know it has been almost two months since Part 3 came out, so… my apologies if you were anxiously awaiting the final post for the series. This week, however, should make you happy. We have an interesting mix of century-plus old properties, all of which I have enjoyed to one degree or another at one time or another, so this should be fun.

Peter Pan (1902): 120 years

Peter Pan (1907), by Oliver Herford

I have early childhood memories of watching the animated Disney Peter Pan film (1953). Can’t remember if I saw a TV broadcast of the musical Broadway production (1954) starring Mary Martin. But, I do remember TV commercials advertising a Peter Pan stage production starring comedic actress Sandy Duncan (1966, 1979-1981), then several years later starring Olympic gymnast Cathy Rigby (1974, 1990, 1998-1999, 2004-2005, 2008-2009, 2011-2013).

Peter Pan (along with Wendy, Tinkerbell, Captain Hook, et al.) was the creation of J.M. Barrie, a Scottish novelist and playwright, though Barrie only produced two distinct, original works featuring the character. The first was The Little White Bird (1902), an adult novel with a section of six chapters collectively titled “Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens”. It has 7-day-old Peter being taught to fly by birds and fairies. Barrie then developed a stage play around the character titled Peter Pan, or The Boy Who Wouldn’t Grow Up (1904). Success convinced Barrie’s publisher to extract the original six chapters from his novel and publish them — with added illustrations by Arthur Rackham — as Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens (1906). He later adapted an expanded version of the play’s storyline into a novel titled Peter and Wendy (1911) (aka Peter Pan and Wendy).

Pan, adventurous leader of the Lost Boys on the mythical island of Neverland, was quite literally the “boy who never grew up” — or, at least, not past 12 or 13 years. He was “an exaggerated stereotype of a boastful and careless boy” with “a nonchalant, devil-may-care attitude, [who] is fearlessly cocky when it comes to putting himself in danger.” It certainly helped that he was a skilled swordsman, mimic, could fly, and sensed danger when it was near. As such, he became “a cultural icon symbolizing youthful innocence and escapism.”

Barrie wrote a sequel play, When Wendy Grew Up – An Afterthought (1908), and Geraldine McCaughrean wrote Peter Pan in Scarlet (2006), the official sequel novel, commissioned by Great Ormond Street Hospital who own the rights. But, there have been many more novels, both authorized and unauthorized, written about Pan and other characters from Barrie’s stories. There have been comics/manga, plays, an authorized musical radio adaptation, TV shows, video & computer games, etc., either centered on Peter Pan or featuring him (and possibly his associates). Same is true for films, both animated and live-action; the first was Paramount’s Peter Pan (1924), a silent movie starring Betty Bronson, while the most recent is Disney’s Peter Pan & Wendy, due for a 2022 release. There have been non-fiction works and bio-dramas, as well as references and homages made in music of various genres. And, of course, there have been tons of related merchandise of different types over the decades.

*Dracula*, 1st ed. reproduction

Dracula (1897): 125 years

Whereas Peter Pan is all about maintaining childlike freedom and innocence, that is impossible to do with Dracula. (Interestingly, there is a connection between the two, as the movie The Lost Boys (1987) is about a gang of youths who are vampires — which, of course, keeps them forever young.) More on that in a minute…

Bram Stoker, personal assistant of actor Sir Henry Irving and acting manager for London’s Lyceum Theatre, supplemented his income writing romance and sensation novels. Written as a series of letters, articles, and diary entries, Dracula has no single protagonist, but the central character is a centuries-old count who “suffers” from vampirism. The novel’s effective use of horror elements resulted in both positive and negative reviews. Stoker earned no royalties on the first 1000 copies sold. It was serialized in American newspapers, then an American edition of the novel was published in 1899. Unfortunately, due to some copyright and registration issues, Stoker didn’t make much money from the book.

Stoker drew heavily from Transylvanian folklore and history, possibly modeling his titular nobleman after the real-life figure of the Wallachian prince known as Vlad the Impaler. Categorized as “Gothic horror”, it is acknowledged as “one of the most famous pieces of English literature”, while the characters of Dracula and Abraham Van Helsing have become archetypes of the vampire and vampire hunter, respectively. Thus, Stoker’s “critical legacy” was finally established after his death in 1912.

Thematically, the topics of “sexuality and seduction” are represented throughout the novel. (Despite being married and fathering a child, some literary and behavioral evidence has led to the theory that Stoker was a repressed homosexual.) Race/ethnicity is another major theme in the novel (e.g., anti-Semitic remarks and assumptions, negative depictions of Slovaks and Romani people). Some have suggested that vampirism as a disease symbolizes Victorian anxieties about STDs and other diseases, while others see more racism in the use of vampiric “disease” (and associated animalistic traits and transformations) among certain peoples.

Dracula has had numerous plays (first being Stoker’s own Dracula, or The Undead (1897)), films (the first being the very loosely-adapted Hungarian silent film, Drakula Halála, the director/star of which later was forced to destroy all copies), TV series, video games and animation, comic books, and of course novels. Even “Sesame Street” has a character called “the Count” and General Mills has its “Count Chocula” breakfast cereal. Multiple academic studies and non-fiction books have been written on Dracula, its origins, legacy, etc. For those with an appreciation for the character and/or the Gothic horror (sub)genre, merchandise ranging from Halloween costumes and fake fangs to jewelry to coffin beds are available.

Count Dracula may not be the first vampire to appear in literature, but he has become the quintessential, iconic vampire and the inspiration for many others.

*The Invisible Man* (1897), cover by Pearson

The Invisible Man (1897): 125 years

Given the era, it isn’t surprising that H.G. Wells has an entry here. (I covered The War of the Worlds and The Time Machine in previous “Notable” posts.) The original version, written between March and June 1896, was a short story titled “The Man at the Coach and Horses” — a reference to a local inn where the central character seeks lodging and tells his tale. But, Wells didn’t like how it turned out, so he (re-)wrote a longer version, i.e., the now-classic novel (novella?). As was common at the time, the story of The Invisible Man was first serialized in Pearson’s Weekly in 1897 but then published in book format later that same year. It’s one of those classics that I haven’t read but really should.

Two major influences are usually mentioned in regards to Wells’s The Invisible Man (not to be confused with Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man (1952), which is about a very different subject). The first is “The Perils of Invisibility,” one of the Bab Ballads by W.S. Gilbert. It includes the couplet, “Old Peter vanished like a shot/but then – his suit of clothes did not.” The second was Plato’s Republic, in which the legend of the Ring of Gyges postulates that a man who became invisible could act so freely that he would “go about among men with the powers of a god.”

As per Allen Grove, professor and chair of English at Alfred University:

The Invisible Man has a wealth of progeny. The novel was adapted into comic book form by Classics Illustrated in the 1950s, and by Marvel Comics in 1976. Many writers and filmmakers also created sequels to the story, something the novel’s ambiguous ending encourages. Over a dozen movies and television series are based on the novel, including a 1933 James Whale film and a 1984 series by the BBC. The novel has been adapted for radio numerous times, including a 2017 audio version starring John Hurt as the invisible man. The cultural pervasiveness of the invisible man has led to everything from his cameo in an episode of ‘Tom and Jerry’ to the Queen song ‘The Invisible Man’.”

I remember watching and enjoying two short-lived “The Invisible Man” TV series, one starring David McCallum (1975-1976) and one starring Vincent Ventresca (2000-2002). It may be time to track those down…

Sherlock Holmes (1887): 135 years

One hundred thirty-five years ago, prolific British author and physician Sir Arthur Conan Doyle published the first story starring “consulting detective” Sherlock Holmes, one of the best-known and most popular fictional characters of the Victorian and Edwardian Eras. Indeed, Holmes became an icon of crime fiction, cementing Conan Doyle’s literary legacy. That first story, “A Study in Scarlet”, appeared in Beeton’s Christmas Annual magazine (1887), followed by the novelization (1888). Conan Doyle would follow up with three more novels and 56 short stories published between 1890 and 1927. Most of the tales are narrated by Holmes’s friend and biographer, Dr. John H. Watson, who often accompanies Holmes on his investigations.

Fun fact: The phrase “Elementary, my dear Watson” is never uttered in any of the sixty stories by Conan Doyle.

Conan Doyle once wrote that, like many fictional detectives, Holmes was inspired by Edgar Allan Poe’s C. Auguste Dupin. Holmes’s speech and behavior were clearly influenced by Émile Gaboriau’s popular Monsieur Lecoq. In fact, Holmes and Watson briefly discuss Dupin and Lecoq in A Study in Scarlet. Conan Doyle is on record as saying that a real-life acquaintance of his, Joseph Bell, a surgeon at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, was another model for Holmes, but Bell insisted that Holmes was based more on Conan Doyle himself. Sir Henry Littlejohn, another notable in the medical field, is also said to have been a major inspiration. Others have been suggested but were never confirmed by the author.

The first two Holmes novels were only moderately well-received, but his popularity took off in both Britain and America once the short stories (beginning with “A Scandal in Bohemia” (1891)) began coming out in The Strand Magazine. Conan Doyle was strangely ambivalent about the character, but when he killed off Holmes (and archnemesis Professor Moriarty) in “The Final Problem” (1893), it led to unprecedented public outcry, including over 20,000 canceled subscriptions to The Strand. Conan Doyle was eventually convinced to “resurrect” Holmes in a story first serialized in The Strand (1901-1902) and then published as a novel, The Hound of the Baskervilles (1903).

The following from Wikipedia summarizes Holmes’s legacy well:

Sherlock Holmes portrait (1904), by Sidney Paget

“Though not the first fictional detective, Sherlock Holmes is arguably the best known. By the 1990s, there were already over 25,000 stage adaptations, films, television productions and publications featuring the detective, and Guinness World Records lists him as the most portrayed literary human character in film and television history. Holmes’s popularity and fame are such that many have believed him to be not a fictional character but a real individual; numerous literary and fan societies have been founded on this pretence. Avid readers of the Holmes stories helped create the modern practice of fandom. The character and stories have had a profound and lasting effect on mystery writing and popular culture as a whole, with the original tales as well as thousands written by authors other than Conan Doyle being adapted into stage and radio plays, television, films, video games, and other media for over one hundred years.”

There are multiple statues of the character around the world, and he has been honored with streets, locomotives, and at least one honorary fellowship named after him (by the Royal Society of Chemistry). There have also been specially-dedicated rooms and exhibits in libraries and museums.

Well done, sir!

I didn’t realize it when I first planned this post, but there are some interesting ties between the authors. Conan Doyle was an acquaintance and distant cousin of Bram Stoker. Conan Doyle also collaborated with J.M. Barrie on the libretto of Jane Annie (1893). Conan Doyle and Barrie were avid cricket players (though Barrie wasn’t nearly as good) and both were members of the Authors Cricket Club and the Allahakbarries. H.G. Wells also played for the the Allahakbarries, as did a few other notables (e.g., Rudyard Kipling, P.G. Wodehouse, A.A. Milne).

That’s another year’s worth of notable anniversaries noted. Whew!

Marvel’s ‘Master of Kung Fu’: Coming to a Theater Near You

Long-time readers of this blog might remember a two-part series I did in September 2015 titled, “7 Marvel Properties that Should Be on TV”. In Part 1, I suggested Shang-Chi as a character with potential:

Shang-Chi in Bruce Lee-inspired ‘jumper’ costume

Shang-Chi: Created in the wake of Bruce Lee’s death, the “Master of Kung Fu” has the dubious distinction of being the son of criminal mastermind/sorcerer Fu Manchu, who trained him as an assassin. He has connections to the Avengers, Heroes for Hire, and the British intelligence community, as he has worked as both spy and adventurer/crimefighter. But, all he really wants to do is live the simple life of a fisherman. I think these and other characteristics make him different enough from Danny Rand (aka Iron Fist) to justify a second show centered on a martial artist. I see it having elements of the old “Kung Fu” series, where our hero wanders all over the globe (e.g., Hong Kong, England, USA), reluctantly either finding himself encountering injustice that needs to be addressed or being contacted & persuaded by other heroes and intelligence agencies to lend them his particular skills and knowledge. With the right vision, writing, and casting, I think such a series could be both charming and action-packed — sort of like Bruce Lee.”

Well, I don’t know if a Shang-Chi TV series will ever happen, but it looks like a big-screen movie just might.

This was first reported by Deadline in early December 2018 and confirmed in a tweet by Disney’s President of Marketing, Asad Ayaz. The project is only in the early stages, of course, so no talent has yet been attached, but they’re “fast-tracking” it to be a Phase Four tentpole. Screenwriter Dave Callaham (The Expendables, Godzilla, Wonder Woman 1984), who is Chinese-American, has been hired to write the script. In keeping with their “diversity” mandate, Marvel Studios is also looking for a director of Asian (or part-Asian) descent to take the helm. And, of course, the star will need to be, as well. Marvel hopes to follow the cross-cultural success of Black Panther by “introduc[ing] a new hero who blends Asian and Asian American themes, crafted by Asian and Asian American filmmakers.”

Observes Sean Gerber at marvelstudionews.com,

“For most of his time in comics, Shang-Chi has not had super powers in the traditional sense, but his mastery of martial arts makes him as formidable as most Marvel heroes. Technically, he’s not enhanced. Effectively, however, he kind of is.

There has been an occasion where there were several Shang-Chi duplicates due to an Origin Bomb, but that does not necessarily mean Shang-Chi can or will be able to duplicate himself in the MCU. My guess is he won’t.”

I wouldn’t be surprised if the Fu Manchu connection was dropped, too, given that 1) the character was created 100+ years ago by British pulp novelist Sax Rohmer as a “Yellow Peril” stereotype, 2) the original stories had elements of Western racism, and 3) Marvel would need to re-acquire the rights to the character. Of course, possible workarounds include 1) referencing Fu Manchu without including him in the plot, 2) including the character while scrubbing all stereotypes and hints of racism, or 3) simply making Shang-Chi’s father a nefarious villain with another name (or no name mentioned), as they’ve done in the comics. Frankly, I’m not sure which I prefer. (I do think the fear of stereotypes can be overblown, though.)

Shang-Chi in classic costume (w/ Fu Manchu in background)

Speaking of stereotypes, Deadline‘s Mike Fleming Jr notes:

“The script will modernize the hero to avoid stereotypes that many comic characters of that era were saddled with.”

As it turns out, this isn’t the first time the character has been talked up for some live, on-screen action. Back in the mid- to late-1980s, the late Bruce Lee’s son Brandon was an up-and-coming actor. Brandon and his mother, Linda, met with Stan Lee (no relation) to discuss the possibility of Brandon playing a Marvel character. The Hands of Shang-Chi: Master of Kung Fu comic series had ended its 10-year run in 1983, but the character was a favorite of Stan the Man, and he thought Brandon could bring him to life on screen.

Margaret Loesch, former President & CEO of Marvel Productions, recalled:

“Stan had great hope [for Brandon]. He thought Brandon would be a future star.

They talked about the kinds of comics that Stan had done, and he mentioned that comic. Stan had great belief that those movies and TV shows based on those types of characters could be very popular. I can’t remember what happened, I think maybe we felt out the networks and they weren’t interested because of the violence.”

It would have been fitting for Brandon Lee to have been cast in that role, especially given that his father was its inspiration. Alas, it was not meant to be.

In the years since, Shang-Chi has had a number of guest appearances and (co-)starred in various comics mini-series, one-shots, and short stories. He even shucked the old, traditional duds for something more “modern”. But, he never regained the popularity he once had during the martial arts-obsessed 1970s. Who knows? Maybe this new movie will launch a resurgence in martial arts fare here in the West. I, for one, am looking forward to it.

Check ‘Em Out!: Entertainment Tropes and a Sci-Fi Museum

Hey!

I wanted to tell you briefly about a couple of websites I recently came across that you might also enjoy.

TV Tropes

As the Welcome statement on the site states, “Merriam-Webster defines trope as a ‘figure of speech.’ For creative writer types, tropes are more about conveying a concept to the audience without needing to spell out all the details.” However, it is online Merriam-Webster’s second definition that is more appropriate here: “a common or overused theme or device : cliché”.

The site, which is no longer limited to TV shows, is all about those plot devices, themes, stereotypes, etc., that frequently show up in various large- and small-screen productions. These tropes and subtropes are given names — e.g., “Book Dumb”, “Let’s Split Up, Gang”, “Lampshading”, or “Rule of Sean Connery” — and then various movies, TV series, and characters are described using these (sub)tropes. (It’s a little bit hard to describe unless you go there.) As you read descriptions of the (sub)tropes, you’ll be saying to yourself, “Oh, yeah, like when…” multiple times. You can browse by genre, media, narrative, topical tropes, or other categories.

In addition to being an “authority” site (sort of), it is also a community. For example, members can go to the “Trope Finder” page to ask fellow-members things like “Do we have this one?” and “What’s the trope about…?” The “You Know That Show…” page is for when you’re trying to remember the name of a show/movie that just escapes you. So, you can try describing it to the community and hope that someone else can identify it for you. Similar pages include “Ask the Tropers”, “Browse TV Tropes”, and “Trope Launch Pad”.

I’m not sure how much I’d actually use this site on a regular basis, but it might be handy to have access for when I do need a research assist. How about you?

Museum of Science Fiction

Did you know there was a Museum of Science Fiction in Washington, D.C.? Well, there isn’t… not yet, at least. The group that runs the site (which I assume is legit) is a 501c(3) nonprofit organization that has been seeking talent and funding since 2013 to make the museum a reality.

Their initial team of 38 volunteers made “significant progress on everything from curatorial aspects such as gallery design and visitor experience to the non-profit management areas of development, project management, education, information technology, public relations, marketing, finance, accounting, and legal compliance.” From there, the first step was to develop “a 3,000-square-foot preview museum where we can test exhibit concepts and new interactive technologies to share a real-time look into this grassroots effort.”

As per the “Preview Museum” page,

“By starting with a small preview museum, doors can open sooner and set the stage for completing the full-scale facility within five years. During this time, the Museum will annually change out the exhibits, stories, and educational content to highlight the best achievements in science fiction and its continuing impact on our culture.

The Preview Museum’s architectural design is modular and highly portable to allow for easy relocation to other cities (such as New York or Los Angeles). After its tour, the Preview Museum will be added as a wing to the full-scale facility….

Our mission is to create a center of gravity where art and science are powered by imagination. Science fiction is the story of humanity: who we were, who we are, and who we dream to be. The Museum will present this story through displays, interactivity, and programs in ways that excite, educate, entertain, and create a new generation of dreamers.”

Meanwhile, they have (co-)sponsored various competitions (e.g., the “Deep Ocean Research and Robotics Competition”) and two annual “Escape Velocity” events — i.e., “a micro-futuristic world’s fair designed to promote STEAM education within the context of science fiction.” They also continue to add content to the museum web-site, and in Jan. 2016 launched the MoSF Journal of Science Fiction, which includes both researched academic articles and short, reflective essays.

If you are curious about the journal’s content, follow the link. Also, here is the Table of Contents for the first issue:

  • Reflecting on Science Fiction, Monica Louzon
  • Biogenetics, The Nation, and Globalization in Paolo Bacigalupi’s Critical Dystopias, Derrick King
  • Gods of War Toke While Riding a Vimana: Hindu Gods in Three Indian Science Fiction Novels, Sami Ahmad Khan
  • Loving the Other in Science Fiction by Women, Karma Waltonen
  • Paul’s Empire: Imperialism and Assemblage Theory in Frank Herbert’s Dune, Amanda M Rudd

As of this writing, three issues have been published (see pic for #3), and they are downloadable for free in PDF format.

I don’t know when I’ll have time to look at this more, especially the journal (though I downloaded all 3 issues), but it all looks & sounds pretty cool to me!

Soon I Will Be Invincible

“There has to be a little bit of crime in any theory, or it’s not truly good science. You have to break the rules to get anything real done.”  — Doctor Impossible

It wasn’t all that long ago that I realized there is a sub-genre of sci-fi/fantasy fiction novels about superheroes. You’d think I would’ve been aware of this, right? I mean, sure, I knew about certain Marvel and DC stories that had been novelized, and I was familiar with the Wild Cards shared-world series edited by George R.R. Martin (though I never read any). But, I didn’t know that the last few years have seen several authors try their hand at such stories. I accidentally came across one at the library a few weeks ago and thought, “Cool!”

Cover to U.S. edition

Cover to U.S. edition

The book is Soon I Will Be Invincible by Austin Grossman. Grossman is a video-game designer/consultant and, at the time of publication (2007), a doctoral candidate in English literature at UC-Berkeley, specializing in Romantic and Victorian literature. Hmm. I noticed it doesn’t say he’s a huge comic fan, but still… could be interesting. At the very least, he should understand how to construct a story, right? He does, and it’s a darned good one, too.

That story is told primarily as a first-person narrative alternating between two of the major players. The first voice is that of Doctor Impossible — would-be world-conqueror and self-made super-villain extraordinaire, “sufferer” of Malign Hypercognition Disorder (i.e, “evil genius” syndrome). While Impossible is the main “bad guy” of the story, he sees himself as more of an outsider who finally found his place in (and, preferably, over) the world, rather than merely “evil”. He matter-of-factly informs us that he is the smartest person by far on the planet and the fourth most dangerous. I’m not sure how much of that is bravado, but he is definitely a formidable foe and one very smart cookie. However, when we first meet him, he is languishing in prison after his 12th defeat and failure of his 5th Doomsday Device. (Can you imagine how frustrating that must be?!)

The second narrator is Fatale — female cyborg and (somewhat) rookie superhero. Fatale has just been recruited by the Champions, the current generation’s #1 superhero team, which had disbanded several years ago but is reforming in the face of a perceived new, global threat. They aren’t quite sure what that threat is, until Doctor Impossible escapes, and they’re pretty sure he has something big in the offing. As the “new girl”, Fatale provides a lens through which the reader gets a feeling for what it’s like to be a superhero (and a cyborg, in particular), meeting your idols and being asked to join them, transitioning from tackling street crime to the “big leagues”, etc. It’s a familiar storytelling device, and it works well here.

Amidst personal reflections, observations, and memories of “origins” and past adventures, Doctor Impossible proceeds to put his next doomsday plan into motion, while Fatale and the New Champions follow clues to locate and (hopefully) stop him. Another aspect of the story is the already-in-progress mystery of the disappearance of CoreFire, the “Superman” of Grossman’s world. CoreFire is one of the founding members of the original Champions and arch-enemy of Doctor Impossible. He is nigh-invincible, which makes the possibilities of what could have happened to him very few. Was he abducted by aliens? Did he leave voluntarily? If so, why? Did Doctor Impossible or some other villain figure out a way to destroy him? Could he be trapped in another dimension? Was magic involved? If anyone knows, they ain’t talkin’. Of course, with his nemesis out of the picture, Doctor Impossible figures this may be the opportunity he’s been waiting for….

As Grossman puts it, Soon I Will Be Invincible is “a book about real people who happen to be superheroes or supervillains.” He takes advantage of the prose format to develop the characters much more than can be done in typical comic book or graphic novel format, exploring their inner thoughts, questions, frustrations, even struggles with the very things that make them “super”. He manages to blend a certain amount of realism in with the comic-book sensibility, giving the reader a “serious” story but without the grimness or cynicism of, say, the aforementioned Wild Cards or Watchmen.

Cover to UK edition

Cover to UK edition

Some of the characters are obviously archetypes. For example, the founding members of the Champions — CoreFire, Blackwolf, & Damsel — are analogs for Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman, respectively. Doctor Impossible is in many ways a stock mad-scientist/megalomaniac villain, yet we learn enough about him to be somewhat sympathetic. The characters’ noms de guerre range, imho, from fairly cool-sounding (e.g., CoreFire, Stormcloud, Baron Ether) to rather silly (e.g., Laserator, Kosmic Klaw, Go-Man). The attitudes, behaviors, powers, and rhetoric of the heroes & villains may be somewhat familiar, even stereotypical. But, Grossman manages to keep the story engaging and avoids venturing into gross caricature. (Possible exception being Doctor Impossible’s recorded speeches, which are supposed to be over-the-top. It’s in the handbook.)

There are action scenes, too, of course. But, the strength of Soon I Will Be Invincible is simply in its knowledgeable exploration of the sub-genre, creating a world of superheroes/villains and seeing what makes them tick. I don’t know that it will be hailed a sci-fi “classic”, but it has received some good press, and it is a lot of fun, especially for those of us who grew up on superhero comics and cartoons. Highly recommended!

P.S.  Just found this as I was going to press: http://www.sooniwillbeinvincible.com/