Hot Takes: From the Matrix to Superman

This week is a “get caught up on industry news” week, but I’m going to keep my comments relatively brief on each of my five news items. At least, that’s the plan…

Drew Goddard

The Matrix

Drew Goddard (The Martian, World War Z) has signed on to write and helm a new movie set in the “Matrix” universe. (Lana Wachowski will exec produce.)

“Drew came to Warner Bros. with a new idea that we all believe would be an incredible way to continue the Matrix world, by both honoring what Lana and Lilly began over 25-years ago and offering a unique perspective based on his own love of the series and characters.” — Jesse Ehrman, president of production for Warner Bros. Motion Pictures

While the last Matrix movie was a little disappointing, I am curious enough to see what Goddard has in mind that I find myself cautiously optimistic about this project.

Avengelyne

Move over, Deadpool. Another co-creation of Rob Liefeld’s — the avenging-angel superhero Avengelyne — may be coming to the big screen. The project is being headed by the team of Margot Robbie, Olivia Wilde, and X-Men producer Simon Kinberg. Beyond that, it is way too early in development for any casting or plot details to be announced. As of last month, they had yet to sell the film to any studios or streamers.

Back in my avid comic-collecting days, I think I had a couple Avengelyne comics, but the character & title never really appealed to me. You might think that it would, since it is based on Judeo-Christian ideas. But, it is only very loosely based and twists biblical concepts in dangerous ways — e.g., making God devious and fallen angels redeemable. (Plus, the character is a scantily-clad, flesh-n-blood, female “angel”.) No thanks! I’ll pass.

Tim Kring

Heroes

Tim Kring, creator of the “Heroes” TV series and “Heroes Reborn” sequel limited series, announced a new sequel series is in development. As of a few weeks ago, writer/exec producer Kring had already pitched the ongoing series to NBC as well as streamers.

“‘Heroes: Eclipsed’ is set years after the events of the original series as new evos are being awakened and discovering powers that will change their lives. Featuring familiar villains and new enemies who once again will be attempting to suppress this next step in human evolution, it will be up to this new group of heroes to save the world.”

Sure, “Heroes Reborn” didn’t quite deliver like the original series, but I’m willing to give the franchise another shot. If we get cameos from the likes of ‘Noah Bennet’ and ‘Hiro Nakamura’, maybe even ‘Sylar’, then I’ll definitely give it a watch.

For All Mankind

If you haven’t been watching this alt-history space drama, then you really should. There is some great acting and very plausible ideas about what could have happened if things went a bit differently at the beginning of the “space race”. I haven’t watched Season 4, yet, but I was happy to read that Season 5 has recently been approved for production. (There is actually a 6- or 7-year plan for the show, so hopefully it will be shepherded along to completion.) There is also a “Star City” spinoff in development, which will be based on an alt-version of the actual Star City, Russia, a “secret city in the forests outside Moscow where the Soviet cosmonauts and engineers worked and lived”.

That all sounds cool to me!

James Gunn (r) w/ Superman

Superman

James Gunn, co-head honcho (with Peter Safran) at DC Films, posted the first photo of David Corenswet in full Superman costume for the upcoming film (prem. 7/11/2025). It shows him pulling on his boots, while a humongous energy sphere (being? vessel?) attacks the city outside his window. (Hurry up, Big Blue!)

The detail getting perhaps the most attention — primarily positive — is the red “underpants” in shadow, which reveals a return to a classic look for the first time in 18 years. For the record, I fully support this decision. The chest logo is very reminiscent of the “Kingdom Come” design, but with yellow background rather than black. I’m OK with this but would have preferred the more classically rounded “S”, which I believe all other on-screen Superman costumes had.

Another costume feature to note appears to be “armor” — or, at least, semi-rigid pieces — sown into the arms, shoulders, and knees. Supes doesn’t really need “armor”, so this design may be for purely stylistic reasons, possibly even to anchor some padding within. It also gives the costume extra ridges and seams, which are controversial. Then there is the collar that goes right up to the neck and slightly upwards. Some have commented that these features reveal a “New 52” influence, and I can see that.

Honestly, I wasn’t thrilled with “New 52” in general, and the costume tweaks were part of that. Whether or not it works for me visually on screen remains to be seen. On the other hand, despite the costume being dirty in places in the photo, it does appear that Gunn has returned the costume to its classically vibrant blue and red shades as well, rather than the darker hues of recent years. YES!

Corenswet looks good, too, especially with the iconic spit-curl.

Any of the above announcements make you smile in anticipation? (Or, maybe cringe?) Let us know below…

10 Most Iconic Genre Villains on Screen

“It puts the lotion in the basket.” — Buffalo Bill in The Silence of the Lambs

Don’t know what got me thinking about this. I’m sure others have put out similar lists, but I thought it might be fun to come up with a list of my own.

Generally speaking, when I refer to “genre” by itself like this, I mean those genres that this blog is most focused on: action/adventure and sci-fi/fantasy. This sometimes overlaps with horror and war-themed movies, etc. So, no surprise that the first pair are where this list was pulled from. I decided to exclude supernatural and other horror-type antagonists (e.g., Dracula, Freddy Kruger, It, poltergeists). I also excluded kaiju and alien species in general (e.g., Godzilla, xenomorphs, Martians). Finally, while I was tempted to include the HAL 9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey, I ultimately decided to limit my consideration of cyborgs, androids/robots, computers, and computer-generated “villains” to those of a generally humanoid appearance. Yeah, somewhat arbitrary, but I wanted to keep my list down to ten (for a change).

So, now that you have a good idea of the types of villains who qualified and who didn’t, here are my final ten most iconic villains from TV and (mostly) film, listed chronologically by first appearance:

Early Khan (TV) | later Khan (film)

‘Khan Noonien Singh’ from Star Trek’s “Space Seed” (1967) and Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982)

Any Trekkie/Trekker worth his or her salt knows about the augmented human known as ‘Khan’, but so do many people who are only casual watchers of Star Trek. He has the rare distinction of first appearing on a TV episode and then returning many years later in a film — second one in the franchise — that continued the TV series. Thanks to Ricardo Montalban’s inspired performance, the character became one of the most beloved of the franchise, despite being a villain.

‘Darth Vader’ in Star Wars films, beginning with Star Wars: A New Hope (1977)

The Star Wars franchise was a monster hit thanks in no small part to this enigmatic Sith Lord with cybernetic limbs and Force-based powers. The combination of David Prowse’s intimidating physique and James Earl Jones’ deep voice helped make Vader the awesome villain and household name that he has become to so many over the past nearly 50 years.

T-800 model terminator in The Terminator (1984)

The Conan movies made Arnold Schwarzenegger an action star, but this one made him a superstar. He became a cyborg — a hyper-alloy combat chassis covered in living human tissue — that could not be bargained or reasoned with. It felt no pain, no remorse. “And it absolutely will not stop… ever… until you are dead!” Cool! And nobody even cared that a cyborg from 40 years in the post-apocalyptic future had a thick Austrian accent.

3 stages of the Kurgan

‘The Kurgan’ in Highlander (1986)

“Happy Halloween, ladies!” Clancy Brown has been in a lot of series and films over the past four decades, but this was one of his earliest and quite possibly his best-known, as well. ‘The Kurgan’ was so-called because he was an Immortal from the steppes of Russia, part of the infamously cruel Kurgan culture. His savagery and complete disregard for life, as well as his later “playfulness”, made him quite a dangerous yet fascinating foe.

‘Clarence Boddicker’ in Robocop (1987)

Kurtwood Smith played ‘Boddicker’, cop-killing leader of a gang of thieves and thugs, in the original Robocop movie. This was another ruthless villain who had no problem hurting and killing people in gruesome ways and for fun, while throwing out one-liners and laughing about it. This, of course, made it all the more satisfying when Boddicker and his boys got their comeuppance thanks to our hero and his partner.

‘Hans Gruber’ in Die Hard (1988)

Who can forget Alan Rickman as the “cultured”, German criminal mastermind behind the attempted bearer-bond heist at Nakatomi Plaza one Christmas? It was Rickman’s first major film role and, thanks to his immense talent, helped to launch himself, the Gruber character, and Die Hard all into the iconosphere. Even his death (at the hands of protagonist ‘John McClane’) became an iconic part of film history. “Happy trails, Hans!”

Dr. Lecter (l) and Buffalo Bill (r)

‘Hannibal Lecter’ and ‘Buffalo Bill’ in The Silence of the Lambs (1991)

Who could forget these two — so different, yet both so evil. The urbane but violent and cannibalistic ‘Dr. Lecter’ was masterfully played by Sir Anthony Hopkins in one of his most noted roles. Cross-dressing, butterfly-raising ‘Bill’ (aka ‘Jame Gumb’), on the other hand, was an odd serial-killer who skinned his victims for his own gruesome purposes. The latter was played to creepy perfection by Ted Levine. I can’t imagine the film being done without either one of them.

T-1000 model terminator in Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991)

The first Terminator movie was originally going to be a T-800 vs. T-1000 scenario, but I’m glad Cameron (and his co-writers) held off on it until the sequel, when they could be more confident in the technology for the “liquid metal” effect of the T-1000. I think it was that effect, plus Robert Patrick’s machine-like portrayal of the T-1000, that made it such a cool character and sucessful film.

‘Agent Smith’ from the Matrix films (1999)

Hugo Weaving invested such cold, calculating menace into this character, partly due I think to the particular way of enunciating and other mannerisms he gave it, that one couldn’t help but listen carefully when he spoke and wonder how Neo, Morpheus, et al. could possibly defeat it. “It” being a program — an A.I. within the A.I. that created the Matrix itself — with a Terminator-like determination to stop the rebels and ultimately exterminate the humankind that it “hates” so much.

Whaddayathink?

I’m sure some of you are thinking, “But, what about… and… “. And, yes, I definitely considered others (e.g., Gene Hackman’s ‘Lex Luthor’ in Superman, Jack Nicholson’s ‘Joker’ in Batman, a couple James Bond villains, the Gunslinger in Westworld, et al.). But, for me, they didn’t quite cut it for inclusion in my Top 10. Feel free to share your list. Maybe you’ll convince me to update mine….

Do You Confuse These Movies, Too?

Have you ever had some actor in a movie you were watching remind you of another movie s/he was in, but you can’t remember the title of that other movie, so you do some research and when you finally track down the movie in question, you realize that the actor wasn’t in it after all? So then you realize there must another, similar(?) movie, featuring the actor you had in mind (maybe), and off you go on another search…?

Or, maybe there are a couple movies that came out close together and with very similar titles and/or plots, and you know this, but you can never remember which is which?

Yeah… same here.

Sometimes it’s something about the plot or setting, sometimes it’s something about the main star. Or, maybe it’s a combination. But, there are certain movies that I just have trouble keeping straight. Sure, if I look them up on IMDB, I realize the differences. But, ask me again a few weeks later, and chances are 50/50 that I’ll confuse them again.

So, I have spent some time recently dredging up from the part of my mind where I store “movie trivia” those that tend to confuse me. I figure, if I share them with you, maybe some of you can identify with the same problem, and we can commiserate….

Chinatown (1974) and The China Syndrome (1979)

The first is a 1930s period piece starring Jack Nicholson (as a P.I.) and Faye Dunaway “caught up in a web of deceit, corruption, and murder.” The second stars Jane Fonda, Jack Lemmon, and Michael Douglas and involves a cover-up at a nuclear power plant. Near as I can tell, the only reason I confuse them is because they are both drama/thrillers that came out in the ’70s and have the word “China” in the title. (Btw, I don’t think I have watched either one.)

Blazing Saddles (1974) and Silverado (1985)

These two are both Westerns, but the first is a comedy starring Cleavon Little and Gene Wilder, whereas the second is a crime/thriller starring a host of big names — e.g., Kevin Kline, Brian Dennehy, Kevin Costner, Danny Glover, Linda Hunt, et al. Other than the “Western” connection, I’m not sure why I often confuse them. Maybe my first viewings of the films were not that far apart — say, some time in the late-’80s or early-’90s?

Like Normal People (1979) and No Other Love (1979)

I think my confusion about these two is understandable. They were TV movies that came out the same year and are both about a mentally-challenged man and woman who meet, fall in love, and want to get married. The first starred Shaun Cassidy and Linda Purl, while the second starred Richard Thomas and Julie Kavner. I saw them both as a kid and enjoyed them.

Time After Time (1979) and Somewhere in Time (1980)

In the first one, Malcolm McDowell plays H.G. Wells; Mary Steenburgen and David Warner also star. There is time-travel involved. In the second, Christopher Reeve is a Chicago playwright who — you guessed it — travels back in time to meet an actress (Jane Seymour). Christopher Plummer also stars.

The Final Countdown (1980) and The Philadelphia Experiment (1984)

Kirk Douglas and Martin Sheen star in the former film, as “a modern aircraft carrier is thrown back in time to 1941 near Hawaii, just hours before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.” In the latter, Michael Paré, Bobby Di Cicco, and Nancy Allen star, as a U.S. Navy destroyer escort participates in a Navy “invisibility” experiment in 1943 that inadvertently sends two sailors forty years into the future. So,… more time-travel, each involving a large naval vessel, one going backward to WWII and one forward from WWII.

Blow Out (1981) and 8MM (1999)

First, we have John Travolta as “a movie sound recordist [who] accidentally records the evidence that proves that a car accident was actually murder”. (John Lithgow and Nancy Allen co-star.) Second, Nicholas Cage plays “a private investigator… hired to discover if a ‘snuff film’ is authentic or not.” (Joaquin Phoenix and James Gandolfini co-star.) Some similarity, of course, though the latter film is much darker.

Why Me? (1984) and Second Sight: A Love Story (1984)

Two more TV movies, also released in the same year. Glynnis O’Connor plays a military nurse who is horribly disfigured in a car accident. She falls into depression, her husband (Craig Wasson) can’t cope, but things look up when a talented surgeon (Armand Assante) thinks he can reconstruct her face. For comparison, Elizabeth Montgomery plays a woman who lost her sight 20 years earlier and stays isolated, because she doesn’t trust people. Then a romance develops with a man she meets (Barry Newman), and she must decide if she wants to go through with an operation to restore her sight. For many years, I thought I remembered Montgomery starring in Why Me?

The Last Starfighter (1984) and Flight of the Navigator (1986)

“Starfighter”… “Navigator”… Earth boy flies in alien spaceship… etc.

Night of the Creeps (1986) and Slither (2006)

I know I saw the first one many years ago, probably on VHS. I think it was while at college, ‘cuz I used to freak out one of my roommates (or, maybe it was my brother?) by making the noise that the slithery, leach-like “creeps” made. I don’t remember if I ever saw Slither, but I may have seen the trailer years ago. It shows a swarm of critters similar to the “creeps”… thus the confusion.

Stand and Deliver (1988) and Lean on Me (1989)

I saw both of these movies way back when. They are not “genre” movies, but I highly recommend them. The first stars Edward James Olmos as a high school math teach who patiently works with and inspires students in his inner-city school to learn calculus. The second stars Morgan Freeman as a “dedicated but tyrannical” principal of an inner-city high school who clashes with students, the school board, and city officials, yet he inspires students to respect themselves and others and to put in the work to better themselves academically. (Both films are based on true stories.)

Double Impact (1991) and Maximum Risk (1996) and Replicant (2001)

In the first of these films, Jean-Claude Van Damme plays twin brothers who are separated but re-united to avenge their parents’ deaths 25 years later. In the second, JCVD plays a French cop investigating the death of the twin brother he never knew he had. In the third, JCVD plays a serial killer and the genetic clone created to help track and stop him. (Actually, that third title should be a clue that it’s the one with the clone.)

Falling Down (1993) and Breakdown (1997) and Changing Lanes (2002)

First: “An ordinary man [Michael Douglas] frustrated with the various flaws he sees in society begins to psychotically and violently lash out against them.” (I think I remember that his car breaks down early on.) Second: “A man [Kurt Russell] searches for his missing wife after his car breaks down in the middle of the desert.” Third: “A young lawyer [Ben Affleck] and a businessman [Samuel L. Jackson] share a small automobile accident, and their mutual road rage escalates into a feud.”

Ransom (1996) and Payback (1999)

These two both star Mel Gibson. In the first, he plays a multi-millionaire whose son is kidnapped, but then he uses the ransom money he gathered as a bounty instead. (Gary Sinise and Rene Russo co-star.) In the second, he plays a man out for revenge, not to mention his share of the money, after he is left for dead following a successful heist. (Gregg Henry, Maria Bello, and Lucy Liu co-star.) Not that similar a plot, but they are near enough in release and possibly look & “mood”, have the same actor as the central character, plus it has been awhile since I watched either one, so maybe that’s enough for my mind to sort of lump them together?

Volcano (1997) and Dante’s Peak (1997)

I actually remember a bit of hubbub when these two were both announced to be releasing the same year. We have a city official and a seismologist (Tommy Lee Jones and Anne Heche, respectively) dealing with a volcanic eruption in downtown Los Angeles. Or, we have a volcanologist (Pierce Brosnan) and friend (Linda Hamilton) dealing with a volcanic eruption next to a popular, countryside town. Details may be different, of course, but still very similar.

Impostor (2001) and Surrogates (2009)

Gary Sinise stars in the first one, alongside Madeleine Stowe, Vincent D’Onofrio and Mekhi Phifer. “In the future, an alien race uses androids as bombs to attack Earth. A government weapons specialist is accused of being one such android and sets out to prove his innocence.” Bruce Willis stars in the second one, alongside Radha Mitchell and Ving Rhames. “Set in a futuristic world where humans live in isolation and interact through surrogate robots, a cop is forced to leave his home for the first time in years in order to investigate the murders of others’ surrogates.” Obviously, the “android duplicates” thing is what occasionally confuses me about these two.

Insomnia (2002) and One Hour Photo (2002)

Anyone who only thinks of Robin Williams as doing comedy really needs to watch these — but with some time in between. The first one has two L.A. detectives (Al Pacino and Hilary Swank) investigating a murder in a small northern town. The second one is about a mentally unstable photo developer who makes a local, upper-middle class family the target of his obsession. Williams plays a creepy bad guy in each one, and they were released the same year, so my confusion is somewhat justified.

Phone Booth (2002) and Cellular (2004)

In the first one, Colin Farrell plays a publicist who is trapped in a phone booth by a hidden extortionist (Kiefer Sutherland) who will shoot him with a sniper rifle if he tries to leave. Forest Whitaker and Radha Mitchell are in it, too. Chris Evans stars in the second one as a young man who receives an emergency phone call on his cell phone from a woman (Kim Basinger) who claims to have been kidnapped and whose husband and child have been targeted next. (William H. Macy is in it, and Jason Statham does a rare turn as a villain.) These two came out pretty close together, but it’s probably just the similarly-themed titles that confuse me a bit.

Whew! Any of those confuse you, too? There are probably a few more that occasionally throw me, but those are the ones I managed to come up with. Any you want to share that you sometimes get confused about? If so, please do below.

More Fantastic Four Casting Reactions

“What gives this family its purpose and its joy isn’t the destination… it’s the journey.” — Fantastic Four Vol 1, #511

Last October I gave my thoughts on certain casting rumors, story possibilities, etc., for the upcoming Fantastic Four movie. Since then, we’ve had some updates on casting, which I would like to give my two cents’ worth about. (Yeah, that was a few weeks ago and I’m a bit slow — hey, I was busy! 🙂 )

We now know that Vanessa Kirby (M:I-6 & M:I-7, Hobbs & Shaw) has been confirmed to be playing Susan Storm / Invisible Woman. As I said in my earlier post, she’s certainly talented but I don’t think she has the right look. The Hot Mic’s Jeff Sneider was also proven correct in the casting of Joseph Quinn (“Stranger Things”) as Johnny Storm / Human Torch. While relatively inexperienced, and not someone I would have picked, I think he may be an OK choice. (They better make him blonde, though.)

Pascal, Kirby, Moss-Bachrach, Quinn

There were rumors about Pedro Pascal (“The Last of Us”, “The Mandalorian”) and Ebon Moss-Bachrach (“The Bear”, “Andor”, “The Punisher”) being involved, and announcements last month (Feb. 2024) confirm that both actors are indeed co-starring in this film. Chilean-born Pascal will play Reed Richards / Mister Fantastic, the leader(?) of the team, whereas Moss-Bachrach will bring pilot Ben Grimm / The Thing to life for audiences this time around. (I am assuming that CGI and/or motion-capture technology will be involved.)

I have to admit, I am not big on the idea of Pascal as Richards. Indeed, the first time I heard or read the rumors about this, my heart sunk a bit, just as it did regarding the idea of Antonio Banderas portraying Galactus (which has not been confirmed). Don’t get me wrong, I generally like Pascal and have enjoyed his performances in a number of things (e.g., “Game of Thrones”, Triple Frontier, “The Mandalorian”). In a few others, he was OK (e.g., “The Mentalist”, Wonder Woman 1984, though my main beef with that last one is the way the character was re-written for the film). But, I strongly believe that, even if he can manage the appropriate voice and mannerisms required to pull off the role, he definitely has the wrong look for playing ‘Reed Richards’. He’s also a touch too old. (Reed may be a few years older than Susan, but the gray at his temples is supposed to be premature!)

Moss-Bachrach, on the other hand, might do a pretty good job, and he doesn’t have to worry about looking the part — unless they show flashbacks to before he transformed or Reed gives him a device for temporarily reverting to human form or simply projecting a hologram of what he used to look like (assuming the use of de-aging tech). I’ve only seen him in a few things, but he does seem quite talented. Plus, like ‘Ben Grimm’, he is Jewish-American. (In fact, he’s the only actual American among the four portraying this all-American team/family.) I don’t know that I would have thought of him for this part, but he might do surprisingly well.

As Snarky Jay said on her podcast, “These are relatively unoffensive [sic] casting choices, right? But, they’re also kind of underwhelming. How about we get somebody that matches the role we’re asking them to play?” My thoughts exactly!

That’s all I’ve got for ya, ladies and gents. See y’all next week!

My 5 Most Anticipated Films of 2024

Yeah, I know. We are two months into the year already, and I am just now putting out a list of upcoming 2024 movies.

If I had put it out at the end of Dec. 2023, I probably would have had to extend the main list to seven and included Argylle and Ballerina. As it is, the former has already been released, and the latter has been re-scheduled for 2025. On the upside, I do have more up-to-date titles and release dates.

So, in order by release date (subject to change, of course), here are my most anticipated films of the year…

Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire (Mar. 29, 2024)

There’s just something about giant apes and lizards… Seriously, though, I love these particular kaiju and their Legendary incarnations. It may seem a little hokey, but teaming them up again — this time against more apes and one especially cunning one, apparently — looks from the trailer to be a really good move.

The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare (Apr. 19, 2024)

This film, directed by Guy Ritchie, hasn’t been on my radar for long, but I’m all for it. The fact that it’s about a crazy, violent, special strike force — including Henry Cavill and Alan Ritchson — pulled together for a special mission during WWII makes it all the more appealing. And it’s based (however loosely) on a real, historical team, too!

Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes (May 10, 2024)

These apes are smaller than in the film mentioned above, but the characters and story are very interesting for other reasons. I hope this is the beginning of another ‘Planet of the Apes’ trilogy, and that we will eventually see 20th- or 21st-century human astronauts flung into the future to encounter this ape-dominated Earth developing before our eyes.

Deadpool & Wolverine (July 26, 2024)

To be honest, I don’t care for some of Deadpool’s humor (which is typical of Ryan Reynolds), due to its often profane or vulgar nature. That aside, I do find Reynolds to be very creative and clever. The biggest draw for me, however, is the team-up with Wolverine. Gotta problem with that, bub?

Alien: Romulus (Aug. 16, 2024)

This horror/sci-fi film is co-written and directed by Fede Alvarez (Don’t Breathe, The Girl in the Spider’s Web). It sounds like the vibe will be similar to that of the original Alien film, though the endangered humans will be a group of “young people”. What is most encouraging to me is that Ridley Scott saw a rough cut and said, “It’s f*#%ing great!”

Since I can’t seem to limit my lists to the number I decided on, here are four more that I am also quite hopeful about:

The Fall Guy (May 3, 2024)

Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (May 24, 2024)

Twisters (July 19, 2024)

Venom 3 (Nov. 8, 2024)

I notice that most of my choices are parts of franchises. (In the case of Twisters, it being only the second film, I guess this film makes the property a “franchise”. I’m not sure if The Fall Guy film is technically part of a franchise, though I did enjoy the original TV series with Lee Majors.) I guess that’s a good thing, ‘cuz it indicates that I have enjoyed previous films about the same subject, or at least in the same fictional universe.

Excuse me while I go pop some popcorn (extra butter)…

Top 10 Posts from Our First 10 years

Believe it or not, this week marks the 10th Anniversary — or, is it Birthday? — of the “Heroes and Aliens” blog! (This was the first blogpost.)

I somewhat pride myself on getting a post out every Wednesday night, and you could count on one hand the number of times I’ve had to skip a week — due to hurricanes and possibly health issues. When I know I’ll be on vacation for a week, which often means traveling on Wednesdays, I rush to prepare one or two “extra” posts and schedule them ahead of time. And, on rare occasions, I have put out an extra post sometime during the week. All told, then, I have posted 520+ articles. Whew!

I thank you for indulging my (more than) occasional trips down memory lane, as well, listing my first this or favorite that. In that spirit, I have a “Top 10” list of prior posts for you. They are not the ones with the most traffic, nor did I force myself to pick one per year. They are simply my ten favorite posts that I wrote over the last decade.

When reviewing potential candidates, I mostly stayed away from other “Top X” lists, straight-up industry news, TV & film reviews, fan-casting, etc. Don’t get me wrong, I was quite happy with how most of them turned out. But, the posts I got the most satisfaction from focused more on my own experiences, observations, assessments, and opinions — sometimes on rather controversial topics. I re-present them to you now (in chronological order) in hopes that you might find a couple of interest. To pique that interest, I have provided a sample from the text of each one…

“My Top 5, All-time Favorite Marvel Superheroes” (pub. 8/7/2014)

“I grew up almost exclusively reading Marvel comics. I eventually got subscriptions, so they were delivered directly to our mailbox. (How I loved seeing those plain, brown wrappers!) I even wrote a brief letter to a title or two and was proud to sign off with “Make Mine Marvel!”… I answered a survey — via snail-mail, of course — from Marvel, asking about their subscribers’ reading habits. I don’t remember much at all about the rest of the survey questions, but I do remember needing to decide who my Top 5 favorite Marvel characters were. And they haven’t changed…”

“Write What You Know” (pub. 1/14/2015)

“Write what you know. That’s what “they” say. That’s what my publisher wants, and that’s what my editor, Frank, keeps pushing for — more “capes-n-tights”. (Technically, what I wore was spandex and a mask, no cape. Well, except for that one time. But, who’s quibbling?) My first two books were full of it, and they sold a ton. So, I don’t blame them for wanting more of the same. The public seems to eat it up. But, I really want to write something different for a change.”

“Proposed Guidelines for Superhero Movie Franchises” (pub. 4/2/2015)

“Sure, the studio, producers, and directors probably all feel pressured to put out the next “action-packed blockbuster” film-of-the-year. And, that’s fine. But, it shouldn’t be at the expense of a coherent story or believable characters, particularly when it comes to respecting the source material. So, here is what I would tell a studio exec who (for some odd reason) asked my advice about what elements — besides good acting, directing, etc. — would make a successful superhero movie franchise: …”

“Superman and the Question of Diversity” (pub. 9/20/2018)

“Remember how some people were pushing for an Asian actor to star in Netflix’s “Iron Fist”, or how many are calling for Idris Elba to be the next James Bond? Well, now there are suggestions of Black (Michael B. Jordan, Idris Elba), Asian (Henry Golding), and Latino (Oscar Isaac) replacements for Superman, among others. Sigh! All fine actors, but c’mon! Should we have a Black Tarzan next? (No, that wouldn’t work, ‘cuz his being white was part of what made the character an outsider in Africa. Besides, that whole “Ape Man” thing would be seen as racist….) Or, how about an Asian Sherlock Holmes? Would that make sense, especially given the era and locales in which the character operated? (Less of an issue for a modern-day take, I suppose. Still…)”

“Why People Resist New Treks” (pub. 9/12/2019)

“I think one of the biggest factors that holds people back from liking a new show or film reboot is precisely the fact that it’s new. Whether we were weaned on the Original Series (TOS) (with subsequent films) or grew up with the TNG/DS9/VOY series, THAT is what Star Trek looks and feels like to us. We generally prefer what is familiar, so when a new show or film introduces new actors, new ships, new looks for “old” things, we balk. It doesn’t look right. Doesn’t feel right.”

“Three ‘New’ Novel Series Worth Checking Out” (pub. 11/26/2019)

“Yeah, we got zombies — tons of ’em! Well, we call ’em “exes”, ‘cuz (as I was told) “zombies” makes ya think of movie monsters, and ya can’t afford to underestimate these things. One bite and yer infected, which pretty much means yer a goner. But, unlike in the movies, we got superheroes, too! … Unfortunately, there are also some not-so-nice non-ex survivors out there. And, guess what? A few of them have super powers, too!”

“Hey, I’ve Got An Idea… or Three” (pub. 12/11/2019)

“I’m sure that you, like me, sometimes get exasperated with the decisions made by TV and studio executives, especially when they cancel series we like, make unnecessary changes to characters, write stories that most of us have no interest in, etc. Well, I came up with a few ideas that I thought might increase the likelihood of fan-satisfaction and successful productions, which I figured I’d share with you all….”

“The First Sci-Fi/Fantasy Books I Read” (pub. 12/2/2020)

“You all know how I like to wax nostalgic at times, right? Well, I’ve been thinking about how I got into sci-fi/fantasy, action/adventure, and related stuff. Sure, there were all the comic books, which were in turn related to the “Superfriends” and other superhero shows I watched Saturday mornings as a kid. Later, there were TV shows like “Star Trek”, “Batman”, “The Six Million Dollar Man”, and some cop shows. But, besides comics and TV shows, what sorts of books did I first read in those genres?”

“Can a Real Trekkie NOT Be ‘Woke’?” (pub. 11/30/2022)

“A while back, I was (briefly) part of a FB discussion in a Star Trek group, where one or more of the newer generation of shows was the topic. A few people were complaining about “woke” aspects being heavy in these new shows, and I also made some comment indicating I was concerned about that stuff. Others clapped back, stating that Star Trek was always “woke” and essentially declaring that anyone who objects to the progressive values Roddenberry instilled in the show from the beginning — sometimes represented by the IDIC (infinite diversity in infinite combinations) concept in Vulcan philosophy — wasn’t a true Trekkie (i.e., Star Trek fan).”

“Three Things I Don’t Understand” (pub. 2/22/2023)

“My real issue here is with books that are tossed, bent, rolled, left outdoors, and otherwise carelessly treated. Barbaric behavior! Part of the reason I am bothered by this is my collector mentality. (In all the years that I collected comic books, you would never find me folding or rolling one up to stuff it in my back pocket — unlike those horrid children one sees doing this in films and TV.) But, more generally, I just hate to see a book mistreated for no good reason.”

It was very hard to narrow it down to ten posts, so I also have a bonus list of six honorable mentions (also in chronological order, of course). Again, I hope you find a post or three that give(s) you a chuckle or that you can in some way identify with:

“You Might Be a Supervillain If….” (pub. 5/7/2014)
“Soon I Will Be Invincible” (pub. 2/11/2015)
“If I Could Have a Superpower…” (pub. 10/7/2016)
“Real-Life Superhero Gear on a Budget” (pub. 7/22/2021)
“Review of She-Hulk: Attorney at Law” (pub. 10/20/2022)
“Delving Into Superhero Novels” (pub. 7/26/2023)

Regular readers know I try to maintain some variety of topics and formats, though I am somewhat limited by time, availability, my own likes and dislikes, etc. With that understanding, I hope to continue what I’ve been doing to keep you (and me) informed and entertained for the foreseeable future. Deal?

My Top 8 Favorite Film Directors

Whaddayasay, time for a Top X list?

Steven Spielberg

I can’t remember what I was doing at the time, but a couple weeks ago I started digging on IMDB and realized how many movies I’d seen by a particular director. (Hint: It’s #8 on the list below.) Now, I’m not someone who is so into film that I usually think about these things. I’m certainly not the type to follow a particular director closely and make sure to watch everything s/he puts out, examine their style, etc. Of course, I am familiar with a few directors who have done several films within the genres that I most watch, and those are what you will find below. So, you won’t see the likes of Alfred Hitchcock, Woody Allen, or Sydney Lumet.

The first criterion for inclusion on the list was that I had enjoyed a minimum of six — preferably more — films that each had done. Many of these, though not all, are in the sci-fi/fantasy or action/adventure arena. Also, while a few directors write, produce, or even act, too, I limited myself to only their directorial projects. Originally, I was going for a Top 3, which quickly expanded to a Top 5. Eventually, I limited myself to the following eight (in no particular order)….

Steven SpielbergJaws (1975), Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977), Raiders of the Lost Ark (1982), E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982), Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984), Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989), Always (1989), Jurassic Park (1993), Saving Private Ryan (1998), Catch Me If You Can (2002).

There were a few others I liked, of course, as well as a few notables about more serious topics that I admit I have yet to see (e.g., Empire of the Sun (1987), Schindler’s List (1993), Amistad (1997)). But, the above list includes the ones I most enjoyed from Spielberg, primarily for the combination of fun/whimsy with action/adventure.

Ron HowardSplash (1983), Cocoon (1985), Willow (1988), Backdraft (1991), Apollo 13 (1995), Ransom (1996), A Beautiful Mind (2001), Solo: A Star Wars Story (2018).

Many of Howard’s films have the same adventure-plus-whimsy formula that Spielberg has, while others (as with Spielberg) are more serious and dramatic. There are at least a couple of Howard’s hits that I want to see but haven’t yet (e.g., Frost/Nixon, Cinderella Man).

Ridley ScottAlien (1979), Blade Runner (1982), G.I. Jane (1997), Gladiator (2000), Hannibal (2001), Black Hawk Down (2001), Kingdom of Heaven (2005), American Gangster (2007), Body of Lies (2008), Prometheus (2012), The Martian (2015), Alien: Covenant (2017).

Scott always does such a great job with intense events and situations, from historically-based stories to his iconic sci-fi work. I’m also looking forward to seeing All the Money in the World and The Last Duel — hopefully, sometime this year.

Christopher Nolan

Christopher NolanMemento (2000), Insomnia (2002), Batman Begins (2005), The Prestige (2006), The Dark Knight (2008), Inception (2010), The Dark Knight Rises (2012), Interstellar (2014), Dunkirk (2017), Tenet (2020).

That’s a pretty good track record for the youngest director on this list. You might be surprised at the absence of Oppenheimer, but I have not seen it and have no interest in it.

Richard DonnerSuperman (1978), Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut (1980), Ladyhawke (1985), Lethal Weapon (1987), Lethal Weapon 2 (1989), Lethal Weapon 3 (1992), Maverick (1994), Assassins (1995), Conspiracy Theory (1997), Lethal Weapon 4 (1998).

There are a few notable films missing (e.g., The Omen, The Goonies) because I either never saw them or they don’t rank among my favorites. Nevertheless, Donner still put out several during my teens and 20s that put him firmly on this list.

James CameronThe Terminator (1984), Aliens (1986), The Abyss (1989), Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991), True Lies (1994), Avatar (2009).

I still haven’t seen Titanic or the more recent Avatar: The Way of Water, so I wasn’t sure if Cameron would make the list. But, he did — obviously! I’m glad, ‘cuz three of those I listed are among my all-time favorite movies.

Quentin TarantinoReservoir Dogs (1992), Pulp Fiction (1994), Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (2003), Kill Bill: Vol. 2 (2004), Death Proof (2007), Django Unchained (2012), The Hateful Eight (2015).

I hesitated to put Tarantino on the list and wasn’t sure he would have enough entries. But, he did, so I did. (And I still haven’t watched Jackie Brown, Inglourious Basterds, or Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.) It’s the stories (which he writes or co-writes) and dialogue that do it for me, and they wouldn’t be the same without his directorial style.

John McTiernanPredator (1987), Die Hard (1988), The Hunt for Red October, Last Action Hero (1993), Die Hard with a Vengeance (1995), The Thomas Crown Affair (1999), The 13th Warrior (1999), Basic (2003).

Honestly, I was surprised at how many McTiernan films ended up here — great stuff! And, yes, a few of my faves are included.

I felt bad about leaving a few others off, so I give the following dozen directors…

Very Honorable Mentions: Martin Scorcese, Francis F. Coppola, Frank Darabont, Clint Eastwood, Brian De Palma, Guy Ritchie, Jonathan Demme, M. Night Shyamalan, John Avildsen, Zack Snyder, Peter Jackson, Chris Columbus

Comments? Observations? Who would be on your list?

New Star Trek Film and Timeline Speculation

No, this is not about the fourth installment of JJ Trek in the Kelvin Timeline — which is reportedly still in the works, btw. But, it is connected.

Star Trek Prime and Kelvin Timelines

Let me clarify. J.J. Abrams is producing it and it does take place within the Kelvin Timeline… maybe. However, this will be a totally new film project, which presumably will not involve any ships named Enterprise nor their crews. In Deadline‘s article that broke the news, Justin Kroll reported that it will be “an origin story that takes place decades before the 2009 Star Trek film,” thereby serving as “an expansion of the ‘Star Trek’ universe.”

While no plot details have been revealed, all speculation seems to be that it will cover the origin and/or early years of Starfleet. For example, IndieWire‘s Christian Blauvelt ventured the following:

“If [the new film takes place] decades before the events of the 2009 film, that means it’s probably after the events of prequel series “Star Trek: Enterprise,” set in the mid 22nd century and concluding with the founding of the United Federation of Planets. So if it’s in the “Kelvin Timeline,” it could be set around the time that Kirk’s father George (played by Chris Hemsworth in the 2009 film) was a first officer in Starfleet.”

But, I see a few problems with this, so allow me to lay out a few established facts

1) In the Prime Timeline, Starfleet was founded in the 2130s as the space exploratory and defense service for United Earth. When the United Federation of Planets was founded in 2161, Starfleet was moved under the authority of the Federation, with its area of responsibility expanding appropriately.

2) The events of “Star Trek: Enterprise” take place primarily in 2151-2155.

3) The Kelvin Timeline branched off in Star Trek (2009) when rogue Romulan captain Nero traveled in his ship from the year 2387 back to 2233 (the year James T. Kirk was born) — that’s 150+ years! (The bulk of the film’s events, however, take place in 2258.) Barring any other “temporal incursions”, everything prior to Nero’s appearance in 2233 should have remained the same. (It was essentially a single timeline.) This would include the founding of Starfleet in the 2130s and the founding of the Federation in 2161.

Haynes and Grahame-Smith

So, regarding Blauvelt’s suggestion for the movie to be in the Kelvin Timeline and to involve George S. Kirk, Sr., it just won’t work. His death resulted almost immediately from Nero’s arrival; after that, the Kelvin Timeline proceeds without a living George Sr. On the other hand, the movie could involve George Sr. anytime in the mid-2220s thru early 2233 (as long as Hemsworth doesn’t look too old), but that wouldn’t be a “Kelvin Timeline movie”, which seems to be what they want.

Of course, they could have another temporal incursion that saves George’s life in 2233, possibly even jumping him through time. Or, they could have another temporal incursion around the founding of either Starfleet or the Federation, possibly delaying either or both. That gets even messier, though. Besides, either of those scenarios would create yet another timeline, so, again, it wouldn’t be a Kelvin Timeline story.

Toby Haynes (“Andor”, “Doctor Who”) will direct the film from a script by Seth Grahame-Smith (The Lego Batman Movie, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies). Let’s hope these guys come up with something enjoyable that doesn’t retcon anything else or involve more alternate timelines. They’re exhausting!

Legendary Comics Writer Chuck Dixon Rips On Disney

I came across this bit the other day and thought it worth sharing.

In context, pop-culture commentator ‘ENDYMION’ was lamenting the various ways that Disney has been ruining Star Wars and Marvel properties for years, especially with lame stories which often lose sight of what made these properties popular in the first place. He then quoted comics veteran Chuck Dixon from a recent interview he did with Bounding into Comics’ show “Escape the Future”, and Dixon had a few bones to pick with “modern-day Disney and media in general”, too.

— — —

Chuck Dixon

“I mean, comics aren’t the only things suffering, and we’re seeing that across the board. I mean, the streaming services, movie attendance, television series… everything else is falling apart, because they’re not aiming it at an audience that actually wants to see it.

Look what Disney did. They spent 8 billion dollars to get two male-oriented franchises and immediately turned them into girly stories. Disney’s already got their princess line. Why do you need to take characters that are typically male-centric or things that boys like and turn them into princesses. I don’t understand this at all. It’s like it was the only thing that they know how to do. But, their stated intent — I remember reading about this extensively when they bought Marvel and Lucasfilm — was that they needed material for boys. They didn’t have anything for boys in their library. And then they screwed both of them up in the worst possible ways you can imagine. It’s amazing how bad they’ve been at this.”

— — —

Dixon’s absolutely right about this. (“The Mandalorian” being a noted exception, but even it has some controversy.) But, I think he actually knows why, ‘cuz it’s obvious from what the executives have said and done. Disney is sold-out to the “woke” disease, so they get writers, producers, and directors to push that agenda (e.g., radical feminism, anti-white racism, LBGTQ+). Anyway…

ENDYMION added his two cents:

— — —

“Nothing Disney has done has worked, and it’s the epitome of trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. They’re simply pandering to the wrong crowd with this sort of thing. And like I said previously, if you want your products to welcome and incentivize both men and women, it turns out they both want the same thing, really — with a little variation, of course.

Men want strong, competent male characters. They don’t want to see a dopey idiot who stands by while girls do the fighting. And women want to see strong male characters that are also nice to look at. I mean, if this wasn’t true, then the last hundred years of cinema and entertainment is a lie, and it’s all a fluke…. What’s happening with a lot of media today is they are taking out the strong, competent men and replacing them with borderline-villain-coated women instead. This ends up being for nobody, and it shows.

What Chuck said here is so true, it’s crazy. But he’s right!”

— — —

I have to disagree with part of what ENDYMION said. For example, the “nice to look at” preference goes for both sides. (He did actually hint at that in a line I left out.) Also, as I have written elsewhere, most of us don’t mind “strong women” characters, superhero or not, as long as the story and characterization are also strong. But, the feminist trope of “independent women” who “don’t need no man” has been overdone over the past couple decades or so (in TV & film, too), and it’s tiring. Making the men look like idiots is equally tiring, and harmful to society. (I better quit before I get into some more socio-political commentary.)

BTW, I re-listened to that weird line toward the end multiple times, so I think I transcribed it correctly. Initially, I had no idea what ENDYMION meant by “borderline-villain-coated women” (or, “borderline, villain-coated women”). But, then I reviewed part of his commentary on Star Wars earlier in the podcast, and I think he is referring to the fact that the upcoming “Star Wars: The Acolyte” streaming series stars a predominantly-female cast and is told from the p.o.v. of the villains.

I realize this was a bit more cynical than I usually am in my commentary, but I thought there were some good observations made. ‘Til next week…

5 Next-Coolest Names in TV & Film

You might not remember, but waaaay back in March 2019 I posted the “6 Coolest Names in TV & Film”. These are “intriguing” names that sound cool or otherwise strike my fancy, as it were. (C’mon, guys! I know I’m not the only one who thinks about this kind of stuff!) Well, I have finally collected five more such names that I find worthy of mention, so without further ado…

1) Time Winters — afaik, that’s his real name — has been on TV since the late ’80s, playing a range of characters. Several examples of things he has appeared in include “Star Trek: The Next Generation”, “MacGyver”, White Dwarf, “Babylon 5”, Thinner, “Buffy the Vampire Slayer”, “Charmed”, “Ghost Whisperer”, “Criminal Minds”, and some voice work (e.g., a couple Elder Scrolls games).

.

.

2) Angel Theory (b.1999) is best-known for her role of ‘Kelly’ in several seasons of “The Walking Dead”, but she also starred in the “Kinderfänger” series and subsequent movie. Though hard of hearing since she was 14, she is also a professional dancer (“So You Think You Can Dance”, “America’s Got Talent”, “Dancing with the Stars”) and choreographer (dance troupe Dance Moms; music videos for Ariana Grande, Mariah Carey, et al.).

.

.

3) Crystle Lightning is an Indigenous Actress from the Enoch Cree Nation in Alberta. (Her mother is actress/producer/director Georgina Lightning.) Some of the projects she has been in are Tecumseh: The Last Warrior, “Southland”, Abducted, “Yellowstone”, “Outlander”, “Trickster”, “The Good Doctor”, “Diggstown”, “Lawmen: Bass Reeves”, et al. She is also a Hip Hop recording artist and a member of the award-winning group “LightningCloud”.

.

4) Perhaps it should no surprise that someone named ‘Texas Battle‘ hails from Houston, TX. In addition to 330+ episodes of “The Bold and the Beautiful”, Battle has starred or appeared in Final Destination 3, Dragonball Evolution, The Task, “SAF3” (his character was also named ‘Texas’), Second Sight, F.R.E.D.I., “Magnum P.I.”, Blowback, Ruthless, etc. And, yes, that is his real name.

.

.

5) Circus-Szalewski — the name just rolls right off the tongue, doesn’t it? — is the stage name of talented character-actor Dennis R. Mooney. He has done stage work as well as sketch performances for the likes of Conan O’Brien and Jimmy Fallon. Much of his on-screen work has been very low-budget, but here are a few of those productions: The Rockville Slayer, The Dork of the Rings, Farewell Darkness, “Prophets of Science Fiction”, The Rule of Law, “Fallout: Nuka Break”, the Evil Bong films, “Brobot”, “Mindhunter”.

.

Honorable Mention: There is also an animation background artist who worked on “The Harper House” and is currently working on “Star Trek: Lower Decks” who is named ‘Issa Go’.

Do you know of a cool, odd, or otherwise intriguing name (from the TV/film industry) that you think might be blogpost-worthy? Let me know below…